College of Business: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Important Site Links

Are hurricanes named after females bigger killers?


6/3/2014

By Phi Ciciora
(originally appeared June 2, 2014, on the Illinois News Bureau website)

Photo: Jung, Viswanathan and Shavitt
(Photo by L. Brian Stauffer)

In the coming Atlantic hurricane season, watch out for hurricanes with benign-sounding names like Dolly, Fay or Hanna. According to a new article from a team of researchers at the University of Illinois, hurricanes with feminine names are likely to cause significantly more deaths than hurricanes with masculine names, apparently because storms with feminine names are perceived as less threatening.

An analysis of more than six decades of death rates from U.S. hurricanes shows that severe hurricanes with a more feminine name result in a greater death toll, simply because a storm with a feminine name is seen as less foreboding than one with a more masculine name. As a result, people in the path of these severe storms may take fewer protective measures, leaving them more vulnerable to harm.

The finding indicates an unfortunate and unintended consequence of the gendered naming of hurricanes, which has important implications for policymakers, meteorologists, the news media and the public regarding hurricane communication and preparedness, the researchers say.

"The problem is that a hurricane's name has nothing to do with its severity," said Kiju Jung, a doctoral student in marketing in the U. of I.'s College of Business and the lead author on the study.

"Names are assigned arbitrarily, based on a predetermined list of alternating male and female names," he said. "If people in the path of a severe storm are judging the risk based on the storm's name, then this is potentially very dangerous."

The research, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, examined actual hurricane fatalities for all storms that made landfall in the U.S. from 1950-2012, excluding Hurricane Katrina (2005) and Hurricane Audrey (1957) because they were much deadlier than the typical storm.

The authors found that for highly damaging storms, the more feminine the storm's name, the more people it killed. The team's analysis suggests that changing a severe hurricane's name from the masculine "Charley" to the feminine "Eloise" could nearly triple its death toll.

"In judging the intensity of a storm, people appear to be applying their beliefs about how men and women behave," said Sharon Shavitt, a professor of marketing at Illinois and a co-author of the report. "This makes a female-named hurricane, especially one with a very feminine name such as Belle or Cindy, seem gentler and less violent."

In a follow-up set of experiments, Jung and his colleagues examined how the gender of names directly affected people's judgments about storms. They found that people who were asked to imagine being in the path of "Hurricane Alexandra" (or "Christina" or "Victoria") rated the storm as less risky and intense compared to those asked to imagine being in the path of "Hurricane Alexander" (or "Christopher" or "Victor").

"This is a tremendously important finding. Proof positive that our culturally grounded associations steer our steps," said Hazel Rose Markus, a professor in behavioral sciences at Stanford University, who was not involved in the research.

Hurricanes in the U.S. formerly were given only female names, a practice that meteorologists of a different era considered appropriate given the unpredictable nature of the storms. According to the paper, an alternating male-female naming system was adopted in the late 1970s because of increased societal awareness of sexism.

(The names of this year's storms, alternating between male and female names, will start with Arthur, Bertha, Cristobal and Dolly.)

Even though the "gender" of hurricanes is pre-assigned and arbitrary, the question remains: Do people judge hurricane risks in the context of gender-based expectations?

"People imagining a 'female' hurricane were not as willing to seek shelter," Shavitt said. "The stereotypes that underlie these judgments are subtle and not necessarily hostile toward women – they may involve viewing women as warmer and less aggressive than men."

"Such gender biases are pervasive and implicit," said Madhu Viswanathan, a professor of marketing at Illinois and a co-author of the study. "We found that people were affected by the gender of hurricane names regardless of whether they explicitly endorsed the idea that women and men have different traits. This appears to be a widespread phenomenon."

Hurricanes kill more than 200 people in the U.S. each year, and severe hurricanes are capable of producing casualties in the thousands, according to the paper. Even with climate change increasing the frequency and severity of storms, hurricane preparedness remains a challenge for officials.

Although the negative effect of gender stereotypes is well-known in hiring decisions and other evaluations of women and men, this research is the first to demonstrate that gender stereotypes can have deadly consequences.

Joseph Hilbe, of Arizona State University, also was a co-author of the paper.

Read more:

Financial Times (London, June 13)
more

The New York Times (June 11)
more

Deseret News (Salt Lake City, June 9)
more

The Post and Courier (from The Associated Press; Charleston, S.C., June 8)
more

"The Colbert Report" (Comedy Central, June 4)
video; U of I mention begins at 1:32

The News-Gazette (June 4)
more

CNN (June 3)
more

Elle (June 3)
more

NPR (June 3)
more

People Magazine (June 3)
more

Popular Mechanics (June 3)
more

Quartz (The Atlantic, June 3)
more

The New York Times (June 3)
more

The Wall Street Journal (June 3)
video

WITN-TV (NBC; Greenville, N.C., June 3)
more

ABC News (from The Associated Press, June 2)
more

Business Insider (from Reuters; New York City, June 2)
more

Calgary Sun (from Reuters; Alberta, June 2)
more

CBS News (June 2)
more

Chicago Tribune (June 2)
more

Daily Freeman (from The Associated Press; Kingston, Jamaica, June 2)
more

Deseret News (from The Associated Press; Salt Lake City, June 2)
more

Detroit Free Press (from The Associated Press, June 2)
more

Fast Company (June 2)
more

Global News (Toronto, June 2)
more

Houston Chronicle (from The Associated Press, June 2)
more

Huffington Post (June 2)
more

Jezebel (June 2)
more

KROI-FM (92.1) (ABC; Seabrook, Texas, June 2)
more

KSHB-Channel 42 (NBC; Kansas City, Mo., June 2)
more

Los Angeles Times (June 2)
more

Mashable (June 2)
more

National Geographic (June 2)
more

National Journal (Washington, D.C., June 2)
more

National Post (from The Associated Press; Don Mills, Ontario, June 2)
more

New York Magazine (June 2)
more

NPR (June 2)
more

Orlando Sentinel (from Reuters; Florida, June 2)
more

Pacific Standard (Santa Barbara, Calif., June 2)
more

Reuters (June 2)
more

San Francisco Chronicle (from The Associated Press, June 2)
more

Science Codex (San Jose, Calif., June 2)
more

Science News (Washington, D.C., June 2)
more

The Boston Globe (June 2)
more

The Economist (June 2)
more

The Florida Times-Union (from The Associated Press; Jacksonville, Fla., June 2)
more

The Globe and Mail (Toronto, June 2)
more

The Guardian (London, June 2)
more

The Huffington Post (from The Associated Press, June 2)
more

The New Zealand Herald (Auckland, June 3)
more

“The PBS NewsHour” (June 2)
more

The Philadelphia Inquirer (from HealthDay News, Norwalk, Ct., June 2)
more

The Plain Dealer (Cleveland, June 2)
more

The Post-Standard (from The Associated Press; Syracuse, N.Y., June 2)
more

The Telegraph (London, June 2)
more

The Times-Picayune (from The Associated Press; New Orleans, June 2)
more

The Verge (June 2)
more

The Washington Post (June 2)
more

The Weather Channel (June 2)
more

Time (June 2)
more

“Today” (NBC, June 3)
more

Toronto Star (June 2)
more

Toronto Sun (June 2)
more

United Press International (June 2)
more

USA Today (June 2)
more

UIUC College of Business